The Measure of Aliveness Kemi C. Amusan Essay 2 What Is Aliveness?

 

 

 

The Measure of Aliveness

 

Kemi C. Amusan

 

Essay 2

What Is Aliveness?

 

Essay 1 ended with a question left deliberately open: what determines whether a person is simply existing inside a sequence of years, or actually participating in the life those years contain? We met a woman ten years into the same job, same desk, same commute, same fluorescent light, who could recite her salary history to the naira but couldn’t tell one Tuesday from the other two thousand. The clock had counted her years correctly. Something else had gone missing.

That something is what this essay calls aliveness. Not enthusiasm, not energy, not appearing vibrant to other people. A person can be quiet and deeply alive. They can be exhausted after a long day and still feel profoundly alive. They can be grieving and alive. Aliveness is the degree to which we remain able to participate in our own existence, which is exactly what determines whether a given stretch of time gets inhabited or merely spent.

Biological Life and Experienced Life

To be alive biologically is one thing. To experience oneself as alive is another. Biology can continue even when the felt experience of living has become remarkably thin. The heart continues beating, the lungs continue exchanging air, the body continues moving through routines. This way, a decade disappears while the person inside it keeps functioning: the clock keeps counting, but somewhere within all that activity there the question, am I actually here?

Can I notice what is happening to me? Can I still want something? Can I imagine something that does not yet exist? Can I be surprised? Can I respond to what life is presenting rather than simply execute whatever has already been demanded of me? These are what convert duration into something that felt like it happened.

Access

We imagine our capacities as properties we permanently possess. I am creative. I am loving. I am curious. But possessing a capacity and having access to it are different.

A musician can own an instrument and still be unable to play when their hands are injured. A writer can have ideas and still be unable to write when their attention is consumed by crisis. The woman at her desk almost certainly still possessed curiosity, desire, the capacity to be moved by something. What she had lost was access to them, and it is that loss of access, not any change in the underlying capacity, that turned ten years into two thousand indistinguishable Tuesdays.

Each dimension below is a capacity whose accessibility can expand or contract, and whose accessibility is precisely what Essay 1 was trying to name when it asked what makes time feel inhabited rather than passed through.

The Permeability Problem

A living system does not just exist; it responds, to other people, to pleasure and pain, to opportunity and threat. When we are chronically numb, this capacity is limited. The space between what happens and what we are capable of feeling in response shrinks. The world keeps arriving, but less and less of it reaches us, which is another way of saying: the hours keep arriving, but fewer and fewer of them leave a trace.

The paradox here is that we need defences, boundaries, routines. But a system that learns to defend itself against pain can also become less available to pleasure, wonder, and surprise. The walls that keep suffering out can eventually keep life out as well, and a life kept out registers as time that passed.

The Dimensions of Aliveness

If aliveness is the degree to which we remain able to participate in our own existence, that participation isn’t a single faculty. It shows up as several distinct capacities, each of which can be present in a person and simultaneously inaccessible to them, and each of which is doing some of the work of turning duration into experience. These are the dimensions.

Desire

Desire is one of the clearest signs that the future remains psychologically open to us. To want something is to experience a difference between what exists and what might exist. Desire gives movement to existence; it turns the future from an abstract continuation of time into a field of possibilities. This separates ten years that feel like an open field from ten years that feel like a corridor: it isn’t only that more time has been spent, but that fewer things were wanted inside it. When desire becomes inaccessible, the future flattens, and the days stop accumulating into anything. They just pass.

Agency

Desire alone is not enough. Aliveness also requires the sense that our responses can matter. A person can know exactly what they want and still feel unable to move toward it, trapped in patterns that leave them increasingly depleted. The woman at her desk may have wanted something different for years without ever experiencing her wanting as actionable, which is one way a decade gets absorbed into routine rather than lived through: the absence of any felt capacity to act on our desires.

Attention

We cannot participate in an experience we cannot attend to. Attention is the mechanism through which the world becomes psychologically available to us, and it is the most direct answer Essay 1 was reaching for. When attention is continually fragmented, life passes through consciousness without being fully experienced. We see without noticing, hear without listening, move without arriving. Thus, an entire afternoon gets remembered as nothing: not because nothing happened, but because no one was attending closely enough for it to register.

Aliveness has a temporal quality that is different from the clock. It is possible to be physically present in a moment while psychologically somewhere else, working while replaying yesterday, sitting at the same desk while mentally elsewhere entirely. The body occupies the present because it has nowhere else to go; the mind is constantly pulled backward and forward. Thus, more time cannot solve the question of running out of life. If a person cannot access the present with sufficient attention, additional hours simply give them more time to remain absent, more Tuesdays that won’t be told apart from each other.

Emotional Range

A highly alive person is not necessarily happy all the time. A fully inhabited life contains grief, frustration, tenderness, anger, and love. However, the emotional world remains available enough for experience to register at all, and register distinctly. Two ordinary Tuesdays become distinguishable from each other the moment something in either of them was actually felt. Grief can be evidence of attachment. Anger can reveal violated values. A year with no distinguishable feeling in it is a year that will later feel like it vanished, because in the way that matters, it did.

Meaning

We do not merely expend time; we interpret what that expenditure means. Two people can spend the same decade at the same kind of job and arrive at it completely differently: one experiencing the years as building toward something they value, the other experiencing them as time that happened to them. Meaning is what converts repetition into accumulation. Its absence is why a job can be technically full of activity, salary raises, promotions, meetings, and still leave nothing behind that feels like it was lived. When too much of a life is spent on things disconnected from anything a person values, the hours become wasted, because they never had nowhere to accumulate to.

Curiosity

Curiosity is the mind’s willingness to encounter what it does not yet know. It makes the world feel larger than our existing conclusions, and it’s one of the quieter reasons some days stay distinct in memory while others dissolve into each other: a day that included something genuinely unfamiliar is a day the mind had reason to keep. Under chronic strain, curiosity becomes expensive. It takes energy to tolerate uncertainty rather than default to the familiar route, the familiar meeting, the familiar version of the day already lived a thousand times.

Creativity

To create is to move something from possibility into reality. It requires enough internal freedom to experiment, enough attention to stay with an emerging idea, enough desire to make something that did not previously exist. Therefore, the loss of creativity can be so disturbing, and it so often shows up as exactly the kind of decade the woman at her desk describes: ideas that once arrived easily stop arriving, because the inner space in which anything new could form gradually disappeared under accumulated demands. What’s left is competence without generativity, years that were productive and still didn’t become anything of the person’s own making.

Connection

We do not experience life in isolation. To feel connected is to experience oneself as participating in something beyond the narrow boundaries of the self. Hence, loneliness can be so depleting even when a person is surrounded by people, in the same office, the same meetings, for ten years. Physical proximity is not connection, and years spent proximate to other people without real exchange accumulate the same way solitary years do: fully counted by the clock, thin in the memory.

Connection also requires capacity. A chronically depleted person may still love others intensely while becoming increasingly unable to participate in relationships the way they want, which means the thinning of a life is rarely visible from outside. It looks like someone still showing up. It just doesn’t feel, from the inside, like time that is going anywhere.

A Living Network, not a Checklist

These dimensions do not operate independently. Attention makes connection possible. Connection can restore emotional capacity. Meaning can sustain effort. Creativity can generate purpose. Rather than being a collection of separate functions, a human life is a living network in which capacities influence one another, and it is the combined access to several of them at once, not any single one, that determines whether a stretch of time gets lived through or simply logged.

This is why aliveness can diminish without disappearing completely, and why a person can spend a decade this way without ever naming what’s happening. They may still have love but not enough energy to express it. They may still have creativity but no space in which to use it. They may still have desire but no agency with which to act on it. What appears to be the loss of a quality is often the loss of access to it, and what appears, from the outside, to be simply time passing is often exactly years accruing on a calendar while access to the capacities that would have made them feel lived quietly narrows.

Why This Distinction Matters

This reframing changes how we interpret ourselves, and it changes how we interpret the years. If I believe I have become an uncreative person, I may conclude that creativity has left me. If I understand creativity as a capacity whose accessibility depends on attention, energy, and environment, I can ask a different question: what happened to the conditions under which my creativity could emerge? If I believe ten years disappeared because I wasn’t paying attention to my own life, I may condemn myself for having wasted them. If I understand attention as a capacity that contracts under strain, I can ask what strain was consuming it, instead of asking what was wrong with me.

This does not absolve us of responsibility. It gives responsibility somewhere more useful to begin: understanding the conditions under which our capacities expand and contract, rather than simply trying to manage time more efficiently, which Essay 1 already showed has a ceiling. A perfectly optimized calendar can still hold an empty life, because optimization addresses duration, and duration was never the actual problem.

Beyond Living and Dying

The language of aliveness gives us a way to ask what the calendar cannot: whether the architecture of a person’s calendar or life leaves them with meaningful access to themselves. Can they still feel? Still want? Still imagine? Still respond? Can they still experience their own existence as something they are participating in, rather than merely enduring, the way the woman at her desk had stopped experiencing hers somewhere inside those ten years without ever marking the day it happened?

There is a vast territory between living and dying. A person can be alive and depleted, alive and disconnected, alive and overextended, alive and barely able to access the capacities that once made existence feel like theirs. That territory is where the years go. Not off the calendar, which keeps perfect count, but out of reach.

Leave a Reply

*

Follow us on Social Media